A great deal of the sport pages space has been dedicated to the furore surrounding Thierry Henry’s handball over the last week or so, so I thought that I would offer my own perspective.
As far as the situation goes, it was most certainly magnified by the significance of the match, as proven by the handball by Wigan Athletic’s Paul Scharner yesterday that went more or less unmentioned. Whilst the situation in either game was entirely different, surely the principal is the same, and so it could be questioned as to whether in the light of last weeks World Cup qualifier, Scharner should indeed have owned up to his crime. Also, whilst it is easy to say that honesty should indeed have prevailed, given the opportunity to send your country to the World Cup following a dubious decision that wasn’t your responsibility to make, wouldn’t you do the same?
A solution to the problem is almost certainly video technology. It has been tried and tested in Rugby and Cricket, and has worked wonderfully well in both, so surely there must be a point at which an error becomes so costly in football that video technology trials are deemed neccessary. Just a trial. Please. The amount of over the goalline disallowed goals and wrongfully awarded penalities should have made the case for this solid enough by now, but it hasn’t, and you would think that this “hand of God” act would tip it over the balance.
Many people argue that the game of football is too fast to facilitate the implementation of video technology, but I disagree. A minute or two to ensure that a correct decision is made wouldn’t low it down that much, and will surely be a benefit to the game, and will give fourth officials something better to do than bumbling around on the touchline telling off managers for voicing their opinions.
Whether this will tip the balance is to be seen, but personally I feel that the calls for video technology now have a cause to be stronger than ever.
